Trees vs. Technology: Why Natural CO2 Storage Is Still the Best Choice

With the recent green light from the Council of State for the Porthos project, which aims to store CO2 in empty gas fields under the North Sea, an old question comes to the fore again: Are technological approaches really better than Mother Nature?

The promise of Porthos

Porthos aims to store 2.5 megatonnes of CO2 under the sea each year using Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology. It is an ambitious plan, which would reduce about 1.5% of the Netherlands' total annual nitrogen emissions.

The proven power of trees

While we are still exploring the potential of technologies such as CCS, there are methods that have proven their effectiveness for centuries. Take tree planting, for example. The Plant n Tree Foundation has set a goal of planting 1 million trees in Sierra Leone by 2030, representing an expected storage of 0.5 million tons of CO2. Trees also provide habitat for animals and bring medicinal benefits to local communities.

Our call

Projects like Porthos undoubtedly have their value, but we also believe in the unparalleled power of nature. Therefore, we call on companies and individuals to partner with us and invest in sustainable solutions that Mother Nature has already provided.

Join us and help make a difference.